Contrary to the opinion of famous jurists, some contemporary jurists argued that men and women are equal in Qisās and Diyāt. They have criticized the well-known traditions and cited other traditions as contradictory to the well-known traditions. The present article seeks to articulate this conflict and provide a solution for its possible resolution. It seems that by this analysis, the well-known traditional documents have the necessary validity and direction and the unknown quote cannot be defended. Of course, they have cited other reasons, such as justice, reason, and so on that be mentioned. Citation to rational independence evidence, as well as justice and equality evidence, be understood by examining and resolving the conflict between well-known and unknown traditions.
Ebrahimi, A. and Rostami, A. (2019). Investigating the Traditions that Cited by Famous Jurists on the Inequality between Men and Women in Qisās and Diyāt. Hadith Research, 11(1), 51-68. doi: 10.22052/0.21.51
MLA
Ebrahimi, A. , and Rostami, A. . "Investigating the Traditions that Cited by Famous Jurists on the Inequality between Men and Women in Qisās and Diyāt", Hadith Research, 11, 1, 2019, 51-68. doi: 10.22052/0.21.51
HARVARD
Ebrahimi, A., Rostami, A. (2019). 'Investigating the Traditions that Cited by Famous Jurists on the Inequality between Men and Women in Qisās and Diyāt', Hadith Research, 11(1), pp. 51-68. doi: 10.22052/0.21.51
CHICAGO
A. Ebrahimi and A. Rostami, "Investigating the Traditions that Cited by Famous Jurists on the Inequality between Men and Women in Qisās and Diyāt," Hadith Research, 11 1 (2019): 51-68, doi: 10.22052/0.21.51
VANCOUVER
Ebrahimi, A., Rostami, A. Investigating the Traditions that Cited by Famous Jurists on the Inequality between Men and Women in Qisās and Diyāt. Hadith Research, 2019; 11(1): 51-68. doi: 10.22052/0.21.51
)