An Analysis of the Ḥadīth “umirtu an uqātila al-nās" (I have been commanded to fight people…) Using an Isnād-Text Dating Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Qur'an and Hadith Studies, Arak University, Arak, Iran;(corresponding author)

2 Full Professor, Department of Qur'an and Hadith Studies, Allameh Tabatabae'i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.d in Qurʾān and Hadith Studies, Arak University, Arak; Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Throughout the history of Islam, incorrect and biased readings of some Qurʾānic ayahs and Aḥādīth have always caused doubts and objections to the sanctity of this religion. Considering that among the decrees covered by the Qurʾān and Aḥādīth is Jihad and the issues surrounding it, and the Ḥadīth “umirtu an uqātila al-nās" (I have been commanded to fight people) is one of the challenging Aḥādīth in this field cited in the jurisprudential rulings of Jihad, with incorrect readings of this Ḥadīth and reference to it, some intend to present Islam as a violent religion. Therefore, an analysis of this Ḥadīth using new research methods and approaches can provide a methodical reading of it.
Materials and Methods
Since the dating of Aḥādīth determines the approximate time of their emergence as well as the course of their historical development, the present article seeks to analyze the aforementioned Ḥadīth using an analytical and combined dating method. To do so, first, the course of historical development of the Ḥadīth at issue will be determined using external and internal dating and then external data and contexts will be employed to externally date the Ḥadīth. Afterwards, given the various writings of such Aḥādīth in Ḥadīth and fiqh sources of Sunnah and Shia, the important points in its internal dating will be investigated. The next step is finding a "common circle" which in the review of the documents of the Ḥadīth will help to determine its date. The final result will arise from the integration and comparison of these reviews that will be presented in the form of isnād-text combined analysis. It is necessary to mention that one of the problems in the external dating of Aḥādīth is studying the cause of entry or the circumstances of the issuing of the Ḥadīth. Accordingly, in external dating of the Aḥādīth expressing the circumstances of issuing of the Ḥadīth “I have been commanded to fight against the people until they testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah. If they do that, their lives and their properties are protected from me, except for the rights of Islam.” it is particularly important to find the historical course of the sources under discussion as well as the historical references mentioned in the Ḥadīth. In the dating of the text of the Ḥadīth, the first step is finding and studying commonalities and differences between different writings of the Ḥadīth in order to achieve the possible and probable developments in the text that can show the overall picture of the changes made in the Ḥadīth. In fact, the structures added to the text or reduced from it, help to attain the original structure of the narrative which other writings of the Ḥadīth have most probably originated from it.
Results and Finings
The dating of the Ḥadīth "umirtu an uqātila al-nās" (I have been commanded to fight people…) showed that this Ḥadīth includes the highest variety of tradition in Sunni narrative sources, particularly in their primary sources, and the texts of these Aḥādīth differ from each other in terms of phrasings and wordings to the extent that one can say these differences are not merely structural. The common circles of these Aḥādīth among the Sunni sources are Abu Hurayra, Malik ibn Anas, Nu'man ibn Salim, and Aws ibn Abi Awas. The oldest source of this Ḥadīth is a fiqh reference among Sunnis and the history of its fiqhi application goes back to the conversation between Umar and Abu Bakr during Ridda Wars, in which citing from the Prophet (S) in the aforesaid Ḥadīth, the decree of fighting those refusing to give Zakat has been drawn while in the cause of the entry of this Ḥadīth which has happened at the time of Wafd Thaqeef, we see an opposing viewpoint. In fact, it can be understood from these Aḥādīth that the Prophet (S) aimed at preventing and specifying the limit of fight and the Aḥādīth concern this limit rather than the cause of fight, that is, La Ilaha Illallah is the redline of fight. Therefore, if the fighting side says La Ilaha Illallah, fighting against them becomes unjustifiable. The network of isnād of the Aḥādīth that in addition to La Ilaha Illallah includes other propositions has ways of singular tradition and the common ring of these Aḥādīth is Qutaiba ibn Said, the closest transmitter to the collectors of Ḥadīth.
Conclusion
The network of isnāds in this group of Aḥādīth, has a spider-like web, which indicates the weakness of the Ḥadīth in question. The Ḥadīth “umirtu an uqātila al-nās" (I have been commanded to fight people) has a singular tradition and it has not been included in the primary sources of Shia although Sheikh Sadugh and Sheikh Tousi, living in the fourth and fifth (AH) centuries, have narrated this Ḥadīth with Sheikh Sadough citing a reference for his mention. Also, naming its source, Barghi has mentioned this Ḥadīth in his Al Mahasen. Because of ways of singular tradition as well as being narrated with no name of the transmitter in other sources, however, drawing the network of isnād and finding the common ring in Shia sources for this Ḥadīth is impossible.

Keywords

References

References
The Holy Qurʾān
Abu Dawaoud, S. (1999). Sunane Abi Dawoud (S. Ebrahim). Dar al-Hadith. [In Arabic]
Aghaei, S. A. (2011). Tarikhgozariye ahadith bar mabnaye raveshe tahlile tarkibiye Isnad -matn: Potentials               and limitations. Sahife-ye Mobin, 50, 101-140. [In Persian]
Asemi Makki, A. (1998). Samt al-nojom al-avali fi anbae al-avael va al-tavali   (A. Ahmed Abdulmajoud & A. M. Moavvez). Dar-al Kotob Ilmiyah. [In Arabic]
Barqi, A. (n.d.). Al Mahasen (Corrected by J. Mohaddeth). (Vol. 2). Dar-al Kotob Islmiyah. [In Arabic]
Beihaqi, A. (2003). Al-sunan al-kobra (M. Abdulghader Ata'). Dar-al Kotob Ilmiyah.
Bukhari, M. (1989). Sahih Al-Bukhari: An investigation by the ministry of endowments (Vol. 2). Arab Republic of Egypt, Ministry of Endowments, Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, Committee        for the Revival of Sunnah Books.
Cook, M. (1981). Early Muslim dogma: A source-critical study. Cambridge University Press.
Darimi, A. (2000). Musnad Al Darmi (Traditions of Al Darmi) (H. Salim Darani). Dar Al Muqni. [In Arabic]
Deilami, H. (1987). Aalam al-din fi sefat al-momenin. Foundation of Al Albait. [In Arabic]
Elahi Khurasani, M., & Morwarid, M. (2017). A criticism of the traditional documentary of the theory of Jihad daawat: the case study of Hadith of Muqatila. Jostarhaye Feghhi va Osuli, 3(8), 9-36. [In Persian]
Ghasempour, M., & Shirinkar Movahed, M. (2015). Barrasiye Sanadi va delaliye hadithe "omerto an oghatela al-nas…"Iranian Journal for the Quranic Sciences and Tradition.  50(1), 101-121. [In Persian]
Goldziher, A. (1958). Al-aghidah va al-shriah fi al Islam. Dar-al Kotob al Haditha.
Hajjaj, M. (1991). Sahih Muslim (corrected by M-F. Abdulbaghi). Dar al-Hadith. [In Arabic]
Hakem, M. (1990). Al-Mustadrak ala al-sahihein (M. Abdulghader Ata'). Dar-al Kotob Ilmiyah. [In Arabic]
Helli, H. (1982). Nahj al-hagh va kashf al-sedgh. Dar al-Kotob Al-Lobnani. [In Arabic]
Horre Ameli, M. (2004) Esbat al-hedat bel- nosous va al-mojezat. A'laami. [In Arabic]
Ibn Abd al-Bar, A. (1991).al-estiab fi marefah al-ashab (A. M. Albajavi). Dar-al Jabal. [In Arabic]
Ibn Abi Jumhur, M. (1984). Awali al-laali al-aziziyah fi al- ahadith al-madiniyah(M. Eraghi). Dar Seyed Al               Shohada Lenashr [In Arabic].
Ibn Anas, M. (2004). Muwatta of Imam Malik (M. Mostafa Azami). Zayed ibn Sultan Al Nahyan Foundation for Charitable and Humanitarian Works. [In Arabic]
Ibn Athir, E. (1965). Al-kamel fi al-tarikh. Dar Sadir-Dar Beirout. [In Arabic]
Ibn Hanbal, A. (1995). Musnad al-Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (A. Ibrahim Zeibagh et al.). Al-Resala Foundation. [In Arabic]
Ibn Hayyan, N. (1695). Daaem al- Islam (A. Feizi). (Vol. 2). Al-Bayt Foundation. [In Arabic]
Ibn Majih, M. (1997). sunane Ibn Majah (B. A. Marouf). Dar al-Jabal. [In Arabic]
------------. (n.d.). sunane Ibn Majah (M. Abdulbaghi). Dar al-Fikr. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sa'ad, M. (1989). Al-tabaghat al-kobra (M. Abdulghader Ata'). Dar-al Kotob Ilmiyah. [In Arabic]
Ibn Seyed Alnas, A. (1993). Oyoun al-athar fi fonoun al-maghazi va al-shamael va al-seir (commented by I. Mohammad Ramezan). Dar-al Ghalam.
Juynboll, G. H. A. (1989). Some isnād-analytical methods illustrated on the basis of several women demeaning sayings from Ḥadīth literature. Al-Qanṭara.
Juynboll, G. H. A. (1993). Nāfiʿ, the Mawlā of Ibn ʿUmar, and his position in Muslim Ḥadīth literature. Der Islam, 70, 207-244.
Juynboll, G. H. A. (1994). Early Islamic society as Reflected in its use of isnāds. Le Muséon, 107(1), 151-     194.
Juynboll, G. H. A. (2001). (Re)appraisal of some technical terms in Ḥadīth science. Islamic Law and Society, 8(3), 303-349. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851901317230611
Kulayni, M. (2008). al-Kafi. Dar-al Hadith. [In Arabic]
Maaref, M., & Shafiei, S. (2015). Daramadi bar motaleate hadithi dar dorane moaser. SAMT. [In Persian]
Majlesi, M-B. (1982). Bihar al-Anwar (Vol. 2). Arab Heritage Revival House. [In Arabic]
Moghrizi, T. (1999). Emta al-asma bema lelnabi men al-ahval va al-amval va al-hefdah va al-mata (M. Abdulhamid Al Namisi). Dar-al Kotob Ilmiyah.
Muaddab, S. R., Sattār, H. (2014). Barresi naghshe vevayate moshtarak dar akhbare montagheleh: A case study of Je'aabi, one of the Sheikhs of Saduq. Hadith Studies, 11, 207-238. [In Persian]
Mutzki, H. (1996). ‘Que vadis, Hadith- Forschung? Eine Kritische Untersuchung von G. H. A. Juynboll: Nafi’ mawla of Ibn ‘Umar, his position in Muslim Hadith literature. Der Islam.
Mutzki, H. (2000). The murder of Ibn Abī l-Ḥuqayq: On the origin and reliability of some Maghāzī-Reports. In idem (ed.), The biography of Muḥammad: the Issue of the sources (pp. 170-239). Brill.
Mutzki, H. (2005). Dating Muslim tradition: A survey. Arabica, 52(2), 204-253.
Nisaei, A. (n.d.a). al-sunan al-kobra (A. Abouqadeh). Maktab Matbou'at Islamiah. [In Arabic]
-----------. (n.d.b). al-mojtaba men al-sunan. House of International Ideas. [In Arabic]
Nouri, H. (1987). Mustadrak al wasail va  mustanbat al masail. Al-Bayt Foundation.
Qomi, A. (1983). Tafsir al-Qomi (corrected by T. Mousavi Jazaeri) (Vol. 3). Dar-al Ketab. [In Arabic]
Rad, A. (2015). Khavarshenasan va hadithe Imamiyeh. Oloume Hadith, 78, 23-59. [In Persia]
Raf'at, S. A. (2014). Al-nabi al-mosleh: The secret documents of the Islamic movements in Egypt (Vol. 2). N. P.
Saduq, M. (1958). Uyoun Akhbar Al-Ridha (M. Lajevardi). Nashre Jahan. [In Arabic]
-----------. (1985). Thawāb al-aʿmāl wa ʿiqāb al-aʿmāl. (Vol. 2). Dar al-Sharif al-Razi Lenashr. [In Arabic]
-----------. (1993). Tazkerah al-foghaha. Al-Bayt Foundation for Heritage Revival. [In Arabic]
-----------. (1995). Al-Khisal (corrected by A. A. Ghaffari). (Vol. 5). Teachers in the seminary                              in Qom, the Islamic Publishing Foundation. [In Arabic]
Schacht, J. (1949). A revaluation of Islamic tradition. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 81(3-4), 143-    154.
Shafi'i, M. (1989). Al omm. Dar Al-Marafah. [In Arabic]
Shahid Thani, Z. (2001). Rawd al-Jinan fi sharhe ershad al-azhan. Boustane Ketab. [In Arabic]
Tirmidhi, M. (1998). sunan Al Tirmidhi (A. M. Shakir). Dar al-Hadith. [In Arabic]
Vaghedi, M. (1988). Al-Maghazi (M. Jones) (Vol. 3). Ala'lami Foundation. [In Arabic]
 
Hadith Research
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 30
30
December 2023
Pages 41-70

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics