Validation of the Traditions of Fitrus Malik and a Critical Review of the Related Research

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Arabic Department, Language Center, Imam Sadeq University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The traditions concerning the story of “Fitrus Malik” are significant accounts that highlight the profound virtues of Imam Hussein (pbuh). According to these traditions, Fitrus Malik, who is either among the exalted angels or one of the esteemed bearers of the Throne, His wings were broken and was removed from his position and exiled to Earth due to his shortcomings in fulfilling his sacred duties. On the day of Imam Hussein’s (pbuh) birth, this angel approaches the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), who prays for him and instructs him to rub his broken wings against the cradle of Imam Hussein. After performing this miraculous act, Fitrus regains his wings and returns to the heavens, proudly proclaiming that he has been freed by Hussein. This story has been widely referenced in various religious texts and has garnered significant attention in recent years, leading to several scholarly studies conducted on the topic. Each of these studies has approached the examination of the traditions from specific perspectives, analyzing their chains of transmission, content, and related issues.
Materials and Methods
This paper employs a comprehensive descriptive-analytical approach and utilizes extensive library research methods to examine and critique the studies conducted in this area. Various articles and other reliable sources related to the topic of Fitrus Malik have been reviewed. The primary aim of this research is to critically assess the authenticity and validity of these traditions, as well as the different opinions regarding their chains of transmission and texts. Furthermore, efforts have been made to enhance and complete the topic by providing credible evidence and relevant indicators.
Results and Findings
The findings of this research indicate that the traditions related to the story of Fitrus Malik are cited in at least seven primary sources and fifteen references from early hadith communities, as well as eleven later sources. Additionally, various pieces of evidence and indicators exist in other sources that enhance the credibility of this tradition, which is supported by numerous corroborative sources. Other similar traditions, such as the supplication attributed to Imam al-Askari (pbuh) and various poetic expressions, further substantiate this story. Thus, the prevalence of the story of Fitrus Malik in the transmitted traditions from various credible Shiite hadith communities is such that the claim of its widespread acceptance is entirely valid and demonstrable. Moreover, the doubts and textual criticisms raised against these traditions, when considered through a proper understanding of the realm of the immaterial and distancing from a materialistic mindset, align with rational and transmitted principles, resolving textual and interpretative issues related to the story. The analogy of the intelligible to the tangible and the use of terms based on their true meanings are two fundamental principles that, when taken into account, provide researchers with correct interpretations of this story. It is also important to note that the tradition of Fitrus Malik, like many religious texts related to the creation, is expressed in the language of legislation and in the context of the realities of existence, and it does not imply that angels possess human-like free will or the ability to disobey God.
Conclusion
This research concludes that the story of Fitrus Malik is not only recounted in credible religious texts but can also be regarded as a valid and reliable account due to the existing evidence and asnads. The examination of the chains of transmission and the texts of these traditions reveals that the overarching purpose of recounting this story is to demonstrate the virtue, greatness, and status of Imam Hussein (pbuh) from the moment of his birth in the sight of God Almighty, and that his intercession is accepted in both this world and the Hereafter. These traditions can contribute to a deeper understanding of the virtues of Imam Hussein (pbuh) and his role in the universe. Therefore, it is essential to focus on issues related to angels, the characteristics of the immaterial realm, and their attributes, leading to a better understanding of religious texts and the related traditions. These results indicate that the traditions of Fitrus Malik are not only credible in terms of their chains of transmission but also align with rational and religious principles in their content.

Keywords


References
The Holy Quran. [In Arabic]
Ibn Idris, M. (1991). al-Sara’ir al-Hawi Li-Tahdir al-Fatawa. Qom: Islamic Publications Office affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Arabic]
Ibn Babawayh, M. (1984). Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih. Qom: Islamic Publications Office affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Arabic]
Ibn Babawayh, M. (1997). al-Amali. Tehran: Ketabchi. [In Arabic]
Ibn Babawayh, M. (2016). Kamal al-Din Wa Itmam al-Ni’ma. Tehran: Islamicah. [In Arabic]
Ibn Babawayh, M. (n.d.). Ilal al-Sharayi. Qom: Daweeri Library. [In Arabic]
Ibn Hamza Tusi, M. (1998). al-Thaqib Fi al-Manaqib. Qom: Ansariyan. [In Arabic]
Ibn Shahra Ashub, M. (2000). Maqasid al-Ali Abi Talib. Qom: Allameh. [In Arabic]
Ibn Tawus, A. (1990). Iqbal al-A’mal. Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah. [In Arabic]
Ibn Quluwaih, M. (1977). Kamil al-Ziyarat. Najaf: Dar al-Murtaza. [In Arabic]
Ibn Mashhadi, M. (1998). al-Mazar al-Kabir. Qom: Islamic Publications Office affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Arabic]
Ibn Manzoor, M. (1995). Lisan al-Arab. Beirut: Dar al-Sader. [In Arabic]
Ehsani Far, M. (2004). A Study on the Traditions of Fitrus Malik. Hadith Sciences, No. 34, 68-80. [In Persian]
Amiri, A. (1977). al-Ghadir. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi. [In Arabic]
Bahrani, S.H. (1992). Madinat Ma’ajiz al-A’immah al-Ithna Ashar. Qom: Islamic Knowledge Foundation. [In Arabic]
Bahrani Isfahani, A. (1984). Awalim al-Uloom Wa al-Ma’arif. Qom: No Publisher. [In Arabic]
Harri Amili, M. (2004). Ithbat al-Hudat Bil-Nusous Wa al-Mu’jizat. Beirut: al-Alami. [In Arabic]
Hilli, H. (2005). Mukhtasar al-Basair. Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation. [In Arabic]
Hoveyzi, A. (2004). Tafsir Noor al-Thaqalayn. Qom: Ismailians. [In Arabic]
Khoei, S.A. (1991). Mojam Rijal al-Hadith Wa Tafsil Tabaqat al-Ruwat. Qom: Center for Publishing Shiite Works. [In Arabic]
Rawandi, Q. (1989). al-Kharaej & al-Jaraeh. Qom: Imam Mahdi Foundation. [In Arabic] al-Khara’ej Wa al-Jara’ih
Rahimi, J. (2014). The Status of Muhammad bin Hasan Safar and the Book Basair al-Darajat in the Hadith Heritage of Shia. Safina Quarterly, No. 45, 81-114. [In Persian]
Rafiei, S.M.A. (2005). The Legend of Fitrus in Contrast with Quranic Teachings. Journal of Children’s and Adolescent Literature, No. 33, 128-137. [In Persian]
Zaki Zadeh Renani, A. (2012). The Exception of Ibn Walid and Its Impact on the Credibility of Basair al-Darajat. Hadith Hawza. No. 4, 78-90. [In Persian]
Subhani, J. (1995). Kulliyat Fi Ilm al-Rijal. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Arabic]
Suyuti, J. (2001). al-Itqan Fi Ulum al-Quran. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi. [In Arabic]
Shabir, J. (1988). Adab al-Taf or Poets of Hussein (pbuh). Beirut: Dar al-Murtaza. [In Arabic]
Shahrani, H. (n.d.). Uyoon al-Mu’jizat. Qom: Daweeri Library. [In Arabic]
Safar Qomi, M. (1990). Basair al-Darajat Fi Fadail al-Ahl al-Bayt. Compiled by Mohsen Koochibaghi. Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Najafi Library. [In Arabic]
Tabatabai, S.M.H. (1996). al-Mizan Fi Tafsir al-Quran. Qom: Islamic Publications Office of the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Arabic]
Tabari Ameli, I.M. (2004). Basharat al-Mustafa Li Shi’at al-Murtada. Najaf: al-Haydariyah. [In Arabic]
Tabari, M. (1993). Dalail al-Imamah. Qom: Ba’that. [In Arabic]
Turihi, F. (1996). Majma’ al-Bahrain Wa Matla’ al-Nairain. Tehran: Mortazavi Bookstore. [In Arabic]
Tusi, M. (2001). Fihrist Kutub al-Shi’a Wa Usulihum Wa Asma’ al-Mu’allifin Wa Ashab al-Usul. Qom: Mohaghegh Tabatabai Library. [In Arabic]
Tusi, M. (1990). Misbah al-Mutahajjid Wa Silah al-Muta’abid. Beirut: Foundation of Shiite Jurisprudence. [In Arabic]
Amili, S.J.M. (2014). Sirat al-Hussein in Hadith and History. Beirut: Islamic Center for Studies. [In Arabic]
Fattal Nishaburi, M. (1996). Rawdat al-Wa’izin Wa Basirat al-Muta’azzin. Qom: Razi Publications. [In Arabic]
Feyz Kashani, M. (1996). al-Wafi. Isfahan: Library of Imam Amir al-Mu’minin (pbuh). [In Arabic]
Qasem Ahmad, M. (2013). “A Critical Study of the Traditions of Fitrus Malik.” Scientific-Research Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies, No. 21, 103-126. [In Persian]
Qomi Mashhadi, M. (1988). Tafsir Kanz al-Daqa’iq Wa Bahr al-Ghara’ib. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Publications. [In Arabic]
Qandahari, M. (2013). The Acceptance of Hadith Books in Imamite Shia Until the Time of Sheikh Tusi. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Karbasi, M.S. (2002). Dairat al-Ma’arif al-Husseiniyyah. London: al-Husseini Center for Studies. [In Arabic]
Kashi, M. (2009). Ikhtiyar Ma’rifat al-Rijal. Mashhad: Mashhad University Publishing Foundation. [In Arabic]
Kabiri, A. (2014). al-Tabariyyoun: A Study of the Concordant and Divergent. Tehran: Journal of Hadith Sciences, Year 8, Issue 16. [In Arabic]
Kaf’ami, I. (1996). al-Misbah. Qom: Dar al-Razi. [In Arabic]
Kaf’ami, I. (n.d.). al-Balad al-Amin. No Publisher: No Publisher. [In Arabic]
Kulayni, M. (1984). al-Kafi. Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah. [In Arabic]
Mamqani, A. (2006). Maqbas al-Hidayah. Qom: Daleel Ma. [In Arabic]
Moudab, S.R. (1999). Science of Hadith. Tehran: Ahsan Publications. [In Persian]
Majlisi, M.B. (1990). Bihar al-Anwar. Beirut: Dar Ihyaa al-Turath al-Arabi. [In Arabic]
Majlisi, M.B. (2004). Zad al-Ma’ad. Beirut: al-Alami Foundation for Publications. [In Arabic]
Masoudi, A. (2005). Ithbat al-Wassiyah. Qom: Ansariyan. [In Arabic]
Motehari, M. (1999). Tawhid. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
Motehari, M. (n.d.). Hamasah Husseiniyah. Tehran: Hamasah Husseiniyah. [In Persian]
Mufid, A. (2020). “Validation of the Traditions of Fitrus.” Specialized Quarterly Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies, 65, 128-155. [In Persian]
Nabatani Amili, A. (2005). al-Sirat al-Mustaqim Ila Mushtahi al-Taqdim. Edited by Muhammad Baqir Behboudi. Tehran: Maktabah al-Murtazaviya. [In Arabic]
Najashi, A. (1986). Rijal al-Najashi. Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Arabic]
Noori, H. (1997). Mustadrak al-Wasa’il Wa Mustanbit al-Masa’il. Qom: al-Bayt Foundation. [In Arabic]