نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد، گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The narration, "Man Ata'a Imra'atahu..." has been reflected in some Shia hadith collections and cited in ethical and jurisprudential discussions. Despite its presence in early sources, a precise and comparative study of its various chains of transmission has received less attention. The current research aims to critically evaluate the authenticity of this narration by conducting a documentary-textual analysis and a comparative root-finding to test the hypothesis of its transfer from Sunni sources. This descriptive-analytical study, employing a comparative approach, was conducted using library research methods, and data were analyzed based on sanad criticism (rijal) and textual scrutiny. This narration has been transmitted in Shia sources with idtirab (discrepancy) in the main narrator, variations in wording, changes in the order and number of prohibitions, and the possibility of idraj (interpolation) of certain phrases. Key findings indicate that the Shia asanid (chains of transmission) of the narration lack sufficient authenticity due to the centrality of a Sunni-leaning narrator (Isma'il ibn Abi Ziyad al-Sakuni) and the presence of unknown chains. A comparative study reveals that this narration is, in fact, a combination of two distinct reports in early Sunni sources: its main part is a statement from Hasan al-Basri, and the second part is a saying from Umar ibn al-Khattab. The chronological precedence of Sunni sources, the Sunni leaning of the primary narrator, the idtirab in the Shia transmission, and the significant textual similarity with Sunni transmissions confirm the hypothesis of this narration's transfer into Shia sources.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)