عنوان مقاله [English]
Among scholars of Islam, there have been, in different directions, various states and divisions for the dream, among them the division of the dream into the credit of person who seen in the dream, explaining that, according to the famous narrative "Whoever has seen me…", " vision of Innocent Person in sleep ", because of its particular feature, has been distinguished from that of others or other things, and has had special effects on it.
However, many scholars have refused to accept it by making dubt either on the basis of the document or the content of the narrative or by expressing intellectual and transmissive conflicts. This article attempts to examine and critique the views of opponents with validity or authority of this particular type of dream.
According to the findings of this study, the set of narrations of vision of Innocent Person in the dream is either spiritual hearsay or at least awaiting; the justifications given for the interpretation of the content are weak and unacceptable; And finally, some claimed conflicts aren’t real and others can be collectable and it is not the case that the narratives are misplaced. In such debates, it is clear that criticizing the arguments of the opponents means the inadequacy of the arguments, and not necessarily the acceptance of the opposite word.