This study seeks, through documentary authentication and semantic analysis of narrations prohibiting transactions with Kurds (Akrād), to clarify whether these narrations indicate an intrinsic or racial ruling for all Kurds. The method is descriptive-analytical and draws on hadith, rijālī, and jurisprudential sources. Findings show that some chains are defective due to irsāl and the absence of explicit tawthīq for Abū Rabīʿ al-Shāmī. Nevertheless, his appearance in chains transmitted by ʿAlī b. Ibrāhīm establishes his reliability, and a convergence of indications—Saduq’s repeated transmission, narration by the Aṣḥāb al-ijmāʿ, and reliance on his book—reinforces it. The original issuance of the narrations is also established by the authority of Saduq’s mursal reports and Ibn Idrīs’s transmission. By contrast, practical fame and the rule of tolerance in the evidences of sunan do not suffice to compensate for documentary weakness. At the semantic level, the apparent meaning conflicts with Qurʾānic principles of human dignity and taqwā and with Islamic anthropology. The author therefore accepts the issuance but rejects the apparent meaning, interpreting the prohibition as referring to accidental attributes and socio-ethical contexts of the Kurdish community of that time—violence, religious recklessness, and banditry. The ruling thus revolves around accidental titles of which Kurds were a clear instance.